‘Feeding the Horses’: modern slavery in The Archers

In our forthcoming, and fourth Academic Archers book, Flapjacks and Feudalism: Class Politics in The Archers, our co-founder, Dr Nicola Headlam, has a chapter about the current modern slavery storyline in The Archers. Here, Nicola writes on the subject as a precursor to her chapter, ‘Feeding the Horses’: Modern Slavery, the dark side of construction hidden in plain sight in Ambridge.

‘Feeding the Horses’: modern slavery in The Archers

 

Gavin (agitated): That’s not how some people will see it, Dad…They’ll say they are slaves.

Philip (growls): Don’t use that word.

(The Archers, broadcast 22nd May 2020)

The reveal, from May of this year,  that Philip and Gavin were colluding in using forced labour followed the accidental explosion in the kitchen at Grey Gables. Blake, the (then-nameless) worker on the spot had ignited a gas grill while using flammable chemicals as he was working on an empty stomach. ‘The Horses’ it emerged, are three vulnerable previously street homeless young men who the Mosses use as an unfree source of labour. They are British, with English as their first language, though talk with hesitancy and a lack of fluidity. They are highly vulnerable and have been ‘rescued’ from the ever-present dangers of rough sleeping. They are housed and fed by the Mosses (in this instance, not enough) and have been manipulated by them into believing that they should be grateful.   Since the end of formal lockdown measures where Gavin spent months with the young men it appears that the psychological mechanisms whereby he viewed them as non-human have slipped, not so for Philip who discussed the sale of a faulty horse with chilling matey-ness to an unknown connection.  This served to broaden out the issue. It is not that the mosses are psychopaths, acting alone. Such practices are rife, and normal for others too.

As I googled ‘what are the signs of modern slavery?’ the algorithm in my computer offered me the earlier searches ‘what are the signs of coercive control’ and ‘what are the signs of sepsis.’ The prompts made me smile, the big meaty public information storylines to have hit Ambridge in the past few years. All set up within long standing characters, vast amounts of public information imparted and the inevitable tussle between credulity as regards characterisation or in service of the drama. As always, when deploying ‘issues’ the scriptwriters engage with the relevant pressure groups, victim’s advocacy and NGOs in order to anchor the storyline. The Gangmasters Labour Authority this week GLAA were consulted by writers in developing credible modern slaves and they tweeted the link this week to a chilling public information film about recruiting ‘unfree’ workers, Trading the Horses. In it a female voice describes how easy it is to attract the vulnerable from drug rehab, homeless shelters and prisons. and in their helpful information we can see how far the young men being enslaved by Moss construction have been street homeless, that English is their first language but that they may have learning difficulties.

 It is made clear to us that Philip styles himself as their saviour rather than their exploiter, and how terrified Blake was during his stay in hospital showed the emotional and psychological grip exerted by Philip and Gavin over their charges. The Archers has shown some bravery in highlighting this issue with such a long build up (extended by the COVID-19 lockdown) and Philip growing in the village as a ‘decent bloke’ despite his sideline as a gangmaster and exploiter of modern slaves. It was telling that in exploring the truth underpinning the storyline I have learnt some truly horrible things about the dark side and how routine the exploitation of workers can be. As the quotation from the chair of the Chartered Institute of Builders, the contemporary incarnation of the very guilds and trades organisations which would have secured decent pay and conditions within early mercantilist capitalism there are the insidious tentacles of slavery within business models which squeeze margins at every point in the supply chain. In exploring how and why ‘the horses’ have ended up in Ambridge I followed the trail into the campaigning activities of various non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and pressure groups who have been highly effective in bringing these elements of the black and grey economy to light. the prevalence of modern slavery speaks of a wider form of neoliberal necropolitics – in which logics of accumulation and hierarchies are played out on the bodies of workers. In this form of political economy social and emotional vulnerability and economic precarity combine together,  trapping those unable to escape exploitation. Victims may be of either gender, be British or from elsewhere and fall through all the cracks and safeguards upon which we all rely. I salute the scriptwriters for their careful examination of this horrible corner of the economy, the backs of those upon whom prosperity is built.

 

 

Not one but two calls for papers!

Two calls for papers at Academic Archers HQ - for the 2021 conference, and for the fifth book, on fandom.

Both listed below, with staggered deadlines.

Call for Papers – The Sixth Academic Archers conference on BBC Radio 4’s The Archers, February 2021 (online)

Dr Cara Courage and Dr Nicola Headlam invite the submission of abstracts to the sixth Academic Archers conference, to be held on 19-21 February 2021, at University of Felpersham, and The Bull and Brookfield Barn, Ambridge (aka, Zoom.)

The conference will feature a number of 15-minute papers, as well as 5 minute Quick Pitches, as well as seeking formats that work with the digital platform, such as film, audio and webinars, around the programme and issues contained therein, of BBC Radio4’s The Archers.

Submissions are invited from any academic discipline and subjects. Past papers have included:

·       ‘From the moment those two joined the committee it’s been grunge bands, sumo wrestlers and souffle competitions’ - What Ambridge’s civil society says about UK politics in 2019

·       Why are the residents of Ambridge so financially gullible and what can we do about it?

·       When the Script Hits the Fan: When Archers fans stop listening – and why they can’t completely keep away

·       Baddies in wheelchairs and the Disneyfication of Disability

This list is not meant to be proscriptive, exclusive or exhaustive, but is meant to inspire you to think how your academic research, sector professional expertise or listener forensic knowledge of The Archers can illuminate and explain life in Ambridge and Borsetshire as well as national and global rural issues. The conference is intended to give fans of The Archers a platform to exercise their love of the programme and their subject area and submissions for consideration are welcomed from those within academia and professional sectors, those working and retired and those with specialist knowledge of The Archers.

If you are a fellow The Archers fan and/or academic please submit your abstract of 200 words with a short biography to both cara@caracourage.net and headlams@gmail.com by 31 August 2020, indicating if you are proposing a paper (15 minutes), Quick Pitch (5 minutes) or other format. Please submit this as a Word attachment. Programming will be determined by an Academic Archers peer review panel and will be communicated from end-September 2020.

Further information on Academic Archers can be found at www.academicarchers.net/ where you will also find links to films of the 2017 and 2018 conferences.

Call for Chapters –Academic Archers book on BBC Radio 4’s The Archers fandom and teaching, learning and research, with Emerald 2021

Dr Cara Courage and Dr Nicola Headlam invite the submission of abstracts for consideration for the fifth Academic Archers book, published with Emerald, a dual aspect concern of BBC Radio 4’s The Archers and fandom studies, and of use of the programme in teaching, learning and research.

Confirmed book chapters include:

·       Fans, Flouncers, Fundamentalists: Customs and belief systems of The Archers online fanbase

·       Cult and Culture: Transformative Fandom de dum de dum de dum

·       Gauging Guerrilla Academia – Exploring the impact of the ‘Academic Archers’ conference

·       When the Script Hits the Fan: When Archers fans stop listening – and why they can’t completely keep away

·       The healing powers of everyday country folk: The Archers? Better than therapy!

This list is not meant to be proscriptive, exclusive or exhaustive, but is meant to inspire you to think how your academic activity on fandom, or your use of storylines or radio production techniques for example, can add to our understanding and value of life in Ambridge.

The book is aimed at an academic and professional audience. Submissions are invited from any academic discipline and subject and can be single or inter/transdisciplinary, anchored in research and/or theory. Chapters selected for the book are invited to present a paper at the sixth Academic Archers conference, February 2021.

This publication will be the fifth of the Academic Archers library, joining The Fall of the House of Aldridge: power, politics and family in Ambridge (Emerald, 2021), Gender, Sex and Gossip: Women in The Archers (Emerald, 2019), Custard, Culverts and Cake: Academics on life in The Archers (Emerald, 2017) and The Archers in Fact and Fiction: Academic Analyses of Life in Rural Borsetshire (Peter Lang, 2016.)

Emerald publishes monographs, handbooks, short form and professional content across a range of business, finance and social science disciplines. Its aim is to publish new and innovative research and practical content that meets the needs of researchers, students, educators and practitioners.

If you are a fellow The Archers fan and/or academic please submit your abstract of 200 words with a short biography to cara@caracourage.net by 31 July 2020.

Further information on Academic Archers can be found at www.academicarchers.net/ where you will also find links to films of the previous conferences, podcasts of the Saturday Omnibuses and publication information.

 

 

ACADEMIC ARCHERS SATURDAY OMNIBUS

To see us through the Archer-less Saturdays for the foreseeable times of isolation , we will host an Academic Archers Saturday Omnibus for anyone to join.

What: An hour and 15 minutes where we watch vids of past Academic Archers papers and have a jolly old chinwag about them.

Who: anyone can join in, and we welcome those that have presented before to present again this way.

When: Saturdays, 11 am to 12.15 pm (and we can keep the channel open if you want to continue chatting), starting 28th March

How: Zoom

What next: put the date in your diary, await our sign-up info, tell your Archers-listening friends.

About Zoom and how to use it

Zoom is a free online video conferencing tool. It can work from your computer, phone or tablet.

You will need to have a Zoom account to use it. This is free and can be got from https://zoom.us/ or via its app (from whatever app store you use.) Do this in good time before the session starts to save the hassle on Saturday.

Each Zoom session has its own unique link and this will be posted each week for the following Saturday. It will be posted to the Facebook page and to the homepage of academicarchers.net. You don’t have to be logged into Zoom to join a session.

Click on the link and you will be asked if you want to join that meeting – click ‘Join a Meeting’ when prompted. Commonly you will be asked by Zoom is join using your camera and microphone – click yes to both (the camera can be turned off and the audio muted later on if you prefer, but do allow them to begin with.)

On joining the session, you will see a screen of all the people in the session, with a controls bar along the bottom and different screen layouts buttons on the top right.

Once you have joined the Zoom session, you can:

1.       turn off the camera if you don’t want people to see you – your name will show in its place. Click the camera icon in the controls bar. You can toggle this on and off as you like.

2.       you can turn off the microphone so people can’t hear the noise from where you are. Click the microphone icon the controls bar. You can toggle this on and off as you like.

3.       you can chat to all the people in the session or just one – click the ‘chat’ icon in the controls bar and a side panel will open with the chat in it (looks very much like a Facebooks message format.)

4.       you can leave the session at any time – click the ‘leave meeting’ button in the bottom right corner. If you want to rejoin, click back on the Zoom link.

Get yourself used to these as we will use them in the Saturday Omnibus sessions. The person leading the session will also share their computer screen with you – this is just a way for you to see what is on their screen and does not interfere with your computer/phone/tablet. Cara and Nicola cannot answer your IT questions and if you have any queries about using Zoom, please look at the video tutorials on its website.  

Omnibus etiquette

·       If you join at the start of the session, before we begin to look at the vids, say a ‘hello’ and then please mute your microphone. You can wave to others as they join or say hello to them in the chat space.

·       If you join when the session is underway, please mute your microphone and say hello with a wave or in the chat space.

·       Please keep your microphone on mute at all times, unless you are speaking. Background noise, the sound of typing, even of breathing, is all picked up and amplified around the chat space which is a distraction for all, and particularly hard for the person speaking to concentre though.

·       If you have a question to ask or a comment to make, please either post this in the chat space or wave, and Cara and Nicola will come to you. When you come to speak, please unmute your microphone and then mute it again when finished.

·       Cara and Nicola will be reading the chat space and will share the comments made.

·       At the end of the session, Cara and Nicola will ask if you want to keep chatting, and if so, will keep the session open (though they may leave the session themselves.)

To whet your conference appetite...

A blog post from conference speaker and Academic Archers royalty, Claire Astbury, of her presentation, ‘Fans, Flouncers, Fundamentalists: Navigating the subcultures of online Archers fan spaces.’

When I want to comment on The Archers, although I am one of those lucky fans who do know fellow listeners in real life, I usually choose to say something online. I might tweet using the hashtag #TheArchers, I might leave a message for the Archers fan podcast DumTeeDum, or I might add to a message thread on one of the Archers Facebook groups I am a member of.

What drives people to set up, join, or leave a fan group? I surveyed over 1000 Archers fans who engage online and also asked questions of group moderators. Over half of the moderators who responded to my questionnaire had established an online group to meet a need they didn’t feel was met elsewhere in cyberspace, Perhaps that's why 30%  of those who engage online said they had left a group because of the atmosphere or tone.  The role of moderators in setting the rules and tone for their group was commented on by members and moderators alike.

Archers fans congregate online to talk about the programme but also to talk about completely different things; their pets, their knitting, their politics, their menopause. My survey identified over 70 separate Facebook groups, alongside Archers discussion threads on other message boards and dedicated websites.  One respondent commented: “There is a wide variety of options which means any fan should be able to find a group/groups they feel suits their needs” whilst others mentioned feeling part of a family, finding their tribe and the life changing impact of finding fellow listeners online.

When it comes to slang, euphemisms and favourite characters, there are many similarities across Archers fans regardless of what platform they use or group they belong to.  The most commonly recognised terms that I tested related to nicknames for key characters.   Some terms such as “Flouncing” emerged not from the programme, but in online fan spaces. “Flouncing” – leaving a group or announcing the intention to leave, often accompanied by a photo of an ostentatious flouncing frock, has now become a well-established custom across a range of platforms.  Other customs are specific to certain groups – the fundamentalist beliefs of the Archers Anarchists for example, who refuse to accept it is a scripted drama with actors. Borchester Asylum, a subgroup of Archers Anarchists, was mentioned by several people and is an example of one of the subgroups and subcultures which have emerged from longer-established fan forums.

When people find the group or groups that are right for them, they are loyal and enthusiastic about their online experience. 

I asked fans about the benefits of their engagement with online communities and several themes emerged. Firstly it's clear that talking about The Archers online enhances listeners experience of the programme and encourages people to listen at all, especially during difficult storylines.

For listeners outside of the UK, the ability to talk to someone about the programme online was significant.  Three quarters of non-British listeners outside of the UK did not know anyone else who listens, except for people online, a figure which was only true for one sixth of UK based British listeners.

The friendships and support of fellow online fans was commented on by many people and was especially valued by older respondents. Nearly half of the fans aged over 70 said they had made friends and had emotional or practical support from among an online fan community.

One in ten of the people responding to the survey had been involved in a pre-internet Archers fan group, mainly via post, but only about one in a hundred were still engaged in those off-line groups.

Overall the research I have done shows that Archers fans value meeting in an online space to meet each other, to talk about the program or indeed anything else. Online groups develop their own language, rituals and atmosphere although many of the nicknames and euphemisms used by fans are common across the fan space. This may be because, with such a wide variety of groups, individual Archers listeners can join multiple groups for different discussions. New groups spring up to meet changing needs and The Archers fan multiverse continues to develop.

 

Hello you two!

Announcing our guest speakers for Academic Archers 2020.

DumTeeDum’s hilarious Lucy V Freeman (Lucy has been listed in Huffington Post's 'Funny Women to Watch') joins us as our Saturday night after-dinner speaker; and at our Museum of English Rural Life welcome reception on the Friday, we are joined by Ben Scott-Robinson, of The Small Robot Company, with a lost pitch to the Ambridge Conversation Trust selection committee.

The Friday welcome reception has sold out, but there are still tickets for the ‘formal-ish’ dinner – and if you have heard Lucy’s Ambridge monologues, you know we are in for a treat. We say ‘formal-ish’ as you are welcome to come dressed for The B@Ambridge, to Lower Loxley Orangery, to a plate of oven chips with Johnny -and after dinner speech from Lucy V Freeman.

University of Reading’s Whiteknights campus (which contains the Cedars hotel, the Meadow suite and the Park House bar. Pre-dinner drinks, Park House Bar, from 6 pm, for 7.30 pm seating.

Tickets here: https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academicarchers

 More on Lucy:

Lucy is co-founder and presenter of DumteeDum, the Archers podcast which has recently been Top Ten in iTunes. She is a comedy writer and actor and writes for the BBC and corporate clients including: Radio 4, BBC Earth, StoryWorks, Shell, Ballou PR, Weber Shandwick, PayPal, BT and Network Rail. Lucy has worked on BBC local radio, written and presented on BBC Radio 4 and the BBC World Service as well as being a freelance journalist on The Times 'Body & Soul' section, The Guardian 'Family' section and Discovery magazine and been a contributor to BBC Woman's Hour, Sky One to Three, BBC 5 Live and BBC Breakfast News. 

More on The Small Robot Company:

The Small Robot company is revolutionising farming with an easy, low-cost, leasing service of autonomous, precision agri-robotics for a healthier, more efficient and sustainable future. This ‘Farming as a Service’ end-to-end system is designed to increase crop yields, accelerate food automation, preserve soil condition and provide a step change in productivity, accelerating the pace towards automation in the farming industry. Its team brings together pioneers and leaders in their fields of agriculture, engineering, machine learning and engineering. Gathering over 15 years of academic research in agri-robotics and 20 years of service design experience we will help farmers to continue to feed our population in a sustainable and smart way.

 

 

 

Academic Archers 2020 conference proceedings announced!

Exciting times at Academic Archers as we can announce the speakers and papers for our fifth conference, taking place 28 February to 1 March next year, at The Museum of English Rural Life and University of Reading.

We are turning our lens to the family dynamics of Ambridge, as well as imaging it as both Springfield and an Egyptian village. This year too, with now five years of Academic Archers under our belts, we are turning the lens on ourselves, asking what Archers fandom is all about (aside from shouting at the radio as our dear Ambridgians go about their daily lives.)

All the info can be found below, and with box office open and tickets selling fast, we advise people to get in quick - and links to all the ticket types can be found below.  

 

Academic Archers 2020, conference proceedings

Friday, 28 February to Sunday, 1 March 2020

 

The Academic Archers MERL Take Over, Friday 6 pm to 8.30 pm

Welcome Reception, The Museum of English Rural Life.

Join us for the opening reception of the 2020 and fifth Academic Archers conference as we take over the Museum of English Rural Life for the evening! We have planned a pop-up exhibition of all things The Archers in its collection, a tour of its galleries, and a buffet dinner (and a special guest TBC!)

 

Tickets: https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academicarchers/290982/

 

Academic Archers 2020, Saturday 9 am - 5.30 pm (Sunday, 9.30-12 – see below)

Conference, The Great Hall, University of Reading.

Weekend tickets: https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academicarchers/293547/

Limited-number Saturday Day Tripper tickets: https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academicarchers/293554/

Academic Archers Formal(ish) Dinner tickets: https://www.tickettailor.com/events/academicarchers/293559/

 

8.30                                 Doors and registration

9 – 9.15                          Welcome from Dr Cara Courage and Dr Nicola Headlam, and Academic Archers Assembly 1                          

Session One: Family - Power and Influence

9.15 - 9.45        Keynote: The 2020 network. One in, One Out, Dr Nicola Headlam               

9.45 - 10           Parents, siblings, and the pursuit of power: Predicting the future leaders of Ambridge, Timothy Vercellotti, Professor of Political Science, Western New England University                       

10 - 10.15         ‘From the moment those two joined the committee it’s been grunge bands, sumo wrestlers and souffle competitions’ - What Ambridge’s civil society says about UK politics in 2019, Amy Sanders, PhD student, Cardiff University

Questions/discussion

10.30 - 10.45   Visionary or Vanity Project – Will the Ambridge Conservation Trust deliver a sustainable future?, Shirley Cramer, CBE CEO Royal Society of Public Health and Food, Farming and Countryside Commissioner, and Jo Bibby, Director of Health at the Health Foundation

10.45 - 11         “If you have security, Ed, that is everything”. Deconstructing ‘security’ as a buffer against life’s challenges, Lalage Cambell, retired Principal Lecturer, Reader and Head of Department of Applied Psychology at Cardiff Metropolitan University

11 - 11.15         The law of the land, land law and family dynamics in The Archers,       Elizabeth Campion, Master of Laws at the University of Cambridge  

 

11.15 - 11.25 Tea Break

 

11.25 - 11.30   Archers Assembly 2                 

 

Session Two Family dynamics - wellbeing and mental health      

Talking Cures

11.30 - 11.45   “They Needed Counselling”, Karen Pollock, psychotherapist specialising in Gender, Sexuality and Relationship diversity           

11.45 - 12         The healing powers of everyday country folk: The Archers? Better than therapy!, Dr Fiona Starr, Clinical Psychologist and an Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology at Middlesex University in London            

Ageing in Ambridge

12 - 12.05         Joe’s Funeral, Abi Pattenden, Funeral Director

12.10 - 12.25   Psychological Wellbeing in Retirement: What The Archers tell us,        Bronwen Williams, mental health nurse

12.25 - 12.40   Can’t Afford the Laurels? - Care Provision in Ambridge in 2041,                    Ruth Heilbronn and Rosalind Janssen, UCL Institute of Education

12.40 - 12.55   Why are the residents of Ambridge so financially gullible and what can we do about it??, Prof Joanna Gray, Birmingham Law School

12.55 - 2         Lunch

 

2 - 2.10             Archers Assembly 3                 

 

Session Three: the fandom panel

2.10 - 2.25        Fans, Flouncers, Fundamentalists: Customs and belief systems of The Archers online fanbase, Claire Astbury

2.25 - 2.40        Cult and Culture: Transformative Fandom de dum de dum de dum,           Helen Burrows, retired senior lecturer and practitioner in Social Work          

2.40 - 2.55        Gauging Guerrilla Academia – Exploring the impact of the ‘Academic Archers’ conference, Prof Carenza Lewis, University of Lincoln                 

2.55 - 3.10        When the Script Hits the Fan: When Archers fans stop listening – and why they can’t completely keep away, Dr Sarah Kate Merry, Coventry University

3.10 - 3.25        “I hate The Archers because…” - a conference intervention, Dr Jerome Turner

Panel responses and questions          

 

3.40 - 4           Tea break

 

4 - 4.10             Archers Assembly 4   

 

Session Four: Intertextual Lucky Dip

4.10 – 4.25       Rude mechanicals– Professional representations of the ‘amateur’ in The Archers Pantomime, Hamish Fffyfe

4.25 - 4.35        Baddies in wheelchairs and the Disneyfication of Disability, Dr Pauline Eyre

4.35 - 4.45        An overview of management styles in the Archers with a discussion of Douglas McGregor’s management Theory X and Theory Y to the Ambridge workforces, Lucinda Bufton

4.45 - 5              DumTeeDum singalong recording, Academic Archers 2020 Conference Award Ceremony

5 - 5.10             Conference proceedings close for the day

Walk/drive/taxi to dinner venue

6.30                   Meet for pre-dinner drinks, Park House, Whiteknights Campus, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6UA

7 – 11                Academic Archers Formal(ish) Dinner, The Meadow Suite, Park House

 

ACADEMIC ARCHERS 2020, Sunday, 9.30 am -12 pm

Conference, The Great Hall, University of Reading.

 

9.00                   Doors and tea and coffee

 

Session 5: Sunday Best

9.15- 9.25         Bringing Ambridge to an Ancient Egyptian Village, Rosalind Janssen, UCL Institute of Education

9.25 – 9.35       Ambridge vs. Springfield, Gary Gilday

9.35 -9.50         A divided village: a narrative study using a theoretical lens of speculative ontology, M Bartlett

10.00 - 11.15   Live Listen, Sunday The Archers Omnibus – and world record attempt at the Tweetalong (tea and coffee available – wandering about encouraged) 

11.15                 Conference closes

 

Academic Archers Fifth Annual Conference 2020: Call for Papers

Dr Cara Courage and Dr Nicola Headlam invite the submission of abstracts to the fifth Academic Archers annual conference on the subject of BBC Radio 4’s The Archers.

Academic Archers are an established experimental academic community where a cornucopia of insights are explored by Research Fellows (qualifications: committed listener) and professional academics (qualifications: university affiliation or independent scholar, broadly defined or specialist practitioner, and committed listener.) The conference is expected to be held over a February 2020 weekend, at a university venue close to London.

Academic Archers are methodologically heterodox and welcome emerging ideas in experimental format, conventional and bids for keynote speakers and submissions are invited from any academic discipline.

 

For this, our fifth annual conference, we seek presentations - with the broadest possible interpretation - on the conference themes of:

1 – Family dynamics: the psychology and business of family relations

For example:

·         How family dramas, inheritance politics and reversals of fortune keep us all hooked.

·         Family and Kinship in Borsetshire.

·         How the case for family therapy/ grief counselling/couples counselling has become unanswerable.

·         Family (business) planning – how not to do it?

·         Macro and micro power; how national politics affect family politics

This conference strand will be curated into a 2021 edited collection for Emerald Academic Press.

  

2 - Fandom as a prism

For example:

·         Using The Archers in teaching and/or research.

·         The online tribes of the wider The Archers firmament.

·         Salience in listener lives: why listeners form intimate relationships with The Archers characters.

·         ‘I listen but I’m not a fan’ identity in The Archers fandom.

This conference strand will be curated into a 2020 edited collection for Emerald Academic Press.

 

The two strands and examples are of course not an exhaustive or exclusive listing and we seek papers on any and all aspects of life in Ambridge.

We welcome wildcards, flights of fancy and suggestions from leftfield. We have accepted papers as films, podcasts, posters, photo-essays, as well as the gamut of quantitative and qualitative approaches, archival and imaginative methods. These topic and format lists are meant to inspire you to think how your academic research, sector professional expertise or listener forensic knowledge of The Archers can illuminate and explain life of The Archers and Ambridge.

 

What you can expect as a presenter is the most committed and engaged audience of your life, listening avidly with curiosity, generosity and joyfulness and probing with the most penetrating of questions.

What we expect of presenters is to be an active member of the Academic Archers community of practice, contributing to media coverage, blogposts, podcasts and other promotional activity as appropriate.

 

If you are a fellow The Archers fan and/or academic please submit your abstract of 200 words with a short biography to cara@caracourage.net and headlams@gmail.com by 1st September 2019. Please indicate the type of presentation you are intending (Quick Pitch, 5 mins, plus Q+A; paper, 15 mins plus 5 mins Q+A; keynote, 45 mins to include Q+A.)

Programming will be determined by an Academic Archers peer review panel made up of our listener research fellows (who give the most detailed of feedback!!)

Decisions will be communicated to presenters by mid-October.

 

A History of Ambridge in 100 Objects?

A post from Felicity Macdonald-Smith, following her paper on the same at conference in Sheffield this year.

I began my talk on the material culture of Ambridge at the Academic Archers 2019 conference in Sheffield by referring to Neil MacGregor’s Radio 4 series and subsequent book ‘A History of the World in 100 Objects’ (MacGregor, 2012), in which he ‘retell[s] humanity’s history through the objects we have made’ (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00nrtd2/episodes/downloads, accessed 8 May 2019). The objects he chose ranged from a 2,000-year old Egyptian mummy, via a Roman silver cup, an Easter Island statue, porcelain vases from the Chinese Yuan dynasty, and an early Victorian tea set, to a 21st century credit card and solar-powered lamp.

The term ‘material culture’ was probably first used about objects like these by General Augustus Henry Lane-Fox Pitt-Rivers, writing in 1875, when he defined it as ‘the outward signs and symbols of particular ideas of the mind’ (Hannan & Longair, 2017). Pitt-Rivers donated his collection of ethnographic and archaeological objects to found the Pitt-Rivers’ Museum in Oxford. Other explorers and collectors were inspired by his gift and the museum now holds over 500,000 items, organised by functional categories, e.g. arms and armour, food and food preparation, medicines and medical instruments, coins and currency etc.

As a follow-up to my talk, Cara Courage suggested that the Facebook group might try to add to the list of Ambridge objects I had put forward, with the aim of getting to a total of 100. Not surprisingly, the group rose to the challenge with great enthusiasm, and 143 different objects were proposed, in 185 comments.

I made several attempts to reduce this to a round 100, using various methods:

  • Not including landscape and locations, however evocative of numerous life-changing events, based on an early definition of material culture as ‘that segment of humankind’s biosocial environment which has been purposely shaped by people according to culturally dictated plans’ (Schlereth 1985, my italics). I also excluded whole buildings, despite them being objects of cultural significance. [Lakey Hill, the motorway service station where Heather died, the village shop, The Bull, the urinals at the Cat & Fiddle, the bar from Nelson’s wine bar].

  • Eliminating animals (even stuffed) on the grounds that they constitute specimens rather than artefacts. [Captain, Scruff, llamas, Hilda Ogden, the badger shot by David, the dead fish found in the Am by Kirsty].

  • Rather reluctantly, I also omitted Joe’s Farmers’ Lung, on the grounds of intangibility, although I suppose an X-ray might have been possible (RIP Joe – although this has not yet happened at the time of writing).
    I merged suggestions where they referred to the same character, e.g. for Lilian – a gin bottle, her favourite gin glass, and a packet of fags.

I submitted a further enquiry to the Facebook group, about items which had been suggested, but I couldn’t clearly remember from my personal listening history. Other contributors were able to elucidate in a few cases, but where doubt remained, I omitted them, on the grounds that they were probably part of a minor incident and as such, not very memorable. My readers are free to disagree! [‘the locket’ - unspecified, may have been given to Lizzie by Nigel; ‘tree festooned with HeatherPet’s toilet rolls’ - not an actual incident, just a reminder of Ruth’s father’s occupation; ‘Fabrice’s CCTV’ - don’t remember any mention of this or any reason why it would be significant].

At this point I started to classify the items into groups. In the spirit of Pitt-Rivers, these were not chronological, but were categories such as ‘agricultural machinery/implements/vehicles’ or ‘food and drink’. This is when I realised that a significant number of the suggestions related to specific incidents, such as the Sid/Jolene shower scene (sorry!) or Shula playing the recorder on Christmas Day at the age of ten (someone clearly has an encyclopaedic knowledge of Ambridge history!).

This led to a complete rethink: what 100 items truly reflect the material culture of Ambridge, rather than the plotlines of the drama – oops! I mean events which have occurred during the timeline of the documentary? So here is my attempt at ‘A History of Ambridge in 100 Objects’. The numbers in brackets indicate where they were nominated by more than one person. I also had fun adding further objects in the process of categorising, because they seemed to be iconic and essential ‘signs and symbols of particular ideas of the mind’ (Pitt-Rivers, 1875 see above).

Agricultural machinery/vehicles/implements/buildings
Many of these items represent ‘traditional’ farming methods, rather than modern, intensive, factory-farming, and as such are a reminder of the origins of the programme, which was supposed to be an educational tool for the post-war agricultural community. One notable exception is the polytunnel, which has additional connotations, as a site for romantic encounters.

1.       a pig ark (3)

2.       David’s toy farm (2)

3.       Bartleby’s pony trap

4.       farm implements belonging to the first generation of Archers: Dan (billhook and plough-horse harness) and Doris (lambing tongs)

5.       one of Jill’s beehives

6.       Tom Forrest’s shotgun

7.       Tony’s old Fergie tractor

8.       a piece of farm machinery salvaged and resold by Josh

9.       the chicken shed (‘egg mobile’) built by Bert Fry for the Fairbrothers

10.   a polytunnel

11.   a quad bike

12.   one of the caravans where the fruit pickers lived

Sadly, in light of current storylines (Ed’s involvement with Tim, and Brian’s contamination case), we should add to this category:

13.   a container of illegal pesticide

‘Community’
This category is a loose collection of places, buildings and other items which illustrate participatory aspects of village life.

14.   the tabard (and supervisor badge) worn by Susan in the village shop, run by the community (2)

15.   a copy of the Borchester Echo (2) – I imagine this to be a typical local paper, containing reports on school sports days, the flower and produce show, parish council elections etc.

16.   a copy of Borsetshire Life – a more upmarket publication, with photos of the Hunt Ball and ‘county set’ weddings

17.   a microphone from Radio Borsetshire

18.   Martha Woodford’s phonebox (2)

19.   Martha Woodford’s hanging baskets

20.   a bell from St Stephen’s, to represent both the bellringers and the bells that fell down from the tower

21.   the church flower rota

22.   a Loxley Barrett school photo

23.   ‘object to represent Borchester Land’ (AGM agenda?)

24.   ‘object to represent Rodway & Watson’ (house sale details?)

25.   the cricket nets and the single wicket trophy

26.   a women’s cricket ‘box’ – deserves a separate listing!

27.   a pantomime script, a cuttings book of reviews, and the ‘fake bum’

28.   a Brownie uniform (they were involved in one of Lynda’s productions)

29.   the maypole/maypole ribbons (maypole dancing also organised by Lynda)

30.   the local history book written by Jennifer Aldridge and John Tregorran (Tregorran & Aldridge, 1982)

31.   the ‘shop closed’ sign from Nelson Gabriel’s antique shop

32.   one of Brenda Tucker’s marketing leaflets

33.   a badge from the SAVE (Save the Ambridge Vale Environment) campaign

34.   a birthday card – always delivered by hand and in person

35.   the Freda Fry trophy from the flower and produce show

36.   a copy of the WI magazine

37.   a vintage cup and saucer from the tearoom

38.   the bunting (of course!)

The last two items in this category are not strictly ‘communal’ as they are situated in Lynda Snell’s garden, but they illustrate the villagers’ amused tolerance of the antics of incomers:

39.   the Resurgam stone – also commemorating the flood

40.   Lynda’s shepherd’s hut, built by Eddie to her design (more or less!)

Memory
“... people sediment possessions, lay them down as foundations, material walls mortared with memory, strong supports that come into their own when times are difficult and the people who laid them down face experiences of loss.” (Miller 2008)

41.   the Grace Archer window in St Stephen’s

42.   Debbie’s jewellery box, with the ballerina ‘that doesn’t stand up any more’ – reclaimed by Debbie when the Aldridges were leaving the Home Farm farmhouse

43.   the old sofa in the Home Farm kitchen – reminisced about as a centre of family life by Jennifer and Peggy on the same occasion

44.   the home-made Christmas tree decorations at Lower Loxley – the subject of a conversation between Lily and Rex

45.   the mangle which had belonged to ‘My Susan’, Joe Grundy’s late wife

46.   Ornament of a Staffordshire bull terrier, given to Jack by Peggy, in memory of Captain

47.   old toys: David’s farm (again), Henry’s rabbit, Ruairi’s Mousie

Food and drink
Not easy to include in a collection such as the Pitt-Rivers Museum, or the British Museum, but since the Ambridge museum is a virtual one, possible deterioration will be disregarded. Local produce and home cooking feature strongly in this group.

48.   a Borsetshire Beauty apple

49.   Borsetshire Blue cheese

50.   Bridge Farm kefir

51.   Label from ‘Tom Archer sausages’

52.   Freda Fry’s hotpot recipe/casserole dish

53.   Aunty Satya’s favourite recipe

54.   lemon drizzle cake and cake tin – preventative measures against Type 2 diabetes (Michael 2017)

55.   Jill’s flapjack – also comes under the heading of ‘community’, as used in activism!

56.   Carol’s ‘herbal’ teas

57.   a pint of Shires (3) – the preferred drink of most of the Ambridge male population and representing the pub as a social centre of village life

58.   Cider Club shed (and loo), cider press (2), glass of Tumble Tussock cider (“actually dissolves spoons” Banks-Smith, 2019)

59.   a few turkey feathers (from the Grundy pre-Christmas enterprise)

60.   a bottle of Scruff ‘craft’ gin

61.   the Brookfield aga – also fits into to the categories of ‘community’ and ‘agriculture’

62.   a menu from “the takeaway on the bypass”

63.   a box which once contained frozen pizza

Clothing and jewellery
Some of these items refer to specific incidents, but nevertheless can also be seen to typify cultural or community activities.

64.   Nigel’s gorilla suit (2)

65.   Jolene’s country & western outfit

66.   Eddie’s hat with horns

67.   Joe’s trick trousers that the ferret got stuck in

68.   Molly Button’s tap shoes

69.   Brian’s/Nelson’s cravat

70.   Shula’s cream cardigan

71.   a pair of running shoes (Usha’s/Annabelle’s/Alistair’s?)

72.   the necklace Helen claimed to have made at evening class when she started seeing Rob

73.   Nigel’s mother’s brooch (given to Lizzie) and brooch given to Ruth by Jill

74.   Pat’s wedding ring (an eternity ring)

75.   the bracelet Pat had received from Helen, which she gave to Natasha for Christmas (5)

This last item deserves special mention, because it was – perhaps surprisingly - the most popular of all those mentioned by members of the Facebook group. In terms of material culture, I think this incident tells us quite a lot: it reflects Pat’s belief that gifts given and received should be of similar monetary value (she was embarrassed that Natasha had brought lavish presents for all the family); it shows that she doesn’t want to appear ungenerous to her son’s girlfriend, or possibly that she doesn’t want to lay herself open to criticism by Natasha; and could also be interpreted by future historians as illustrating the acceptability of the practice of ‘re-gifting’, although Helen certainly did not find it acceptable.

Character
Although this grouping contains items representative of specific village characters, they can also be seen as representative of class, attitudes, hobbies or occupations.

76.   Nelson Gabriel’s black satin sheets (2)

77.   Mr Snowy ice-cream van (2)

78.   Eddie’s guitar

79.   Clarrie’s dresser, damaged in the flood and unsuccessfully restored by Eddie and Joe

80.   a piece of furniture ‘upcycled’ by Fallon

81.   Lilian’s gin bottle and cigarettes/ashtray

82.   a book on ‘choosing a name for your baby’ in which Lilian has written ‘Mungo? Seriously???’

83.   Jim’s classic Riley

84.   Kate’s smudging sticks

85.   Information leaflets on having a baby by AI (Helen) and surrogacy (Adam & Ian)

86.   Photo of Mrs Antrobus with her dogs

87.   Kenton’s bouncy castle

88.   Ben’s airgun

89.   Lily’s Gwen John painting (left to her by Nigel for her 18th birthday)

90.   Freddie’s secret stash

91.   Russ’s multi-temperature kettle

92.   Susan’s chilli con carne recipe

93.   Jennifer’s kitchen: special sink, taps, food mixer, wine fridge

94.   Thor’s hammer (Mjolnir) made by Chris Carter

95.   the ‘fairy’ doors constructed in the woods as part of one of the Grundy money-making escapades

96.   Usha’s Hindu statue (installed at the vicarage, to Shula’s dismay)

97.   Walter Gabriel’s leech jar

98.   Fabrice’s scissors

99.   Cutlery Derek Fletcher used to juggle with at village shows

100.                        Leonard’s sketches of snowdrops

Thank you to the Academic Archers Facebook community for your suggestions: comments and further ideas always welcome!

References:

Banks-Smith, N., ‘The Archers’ Joe Grundy: farewell from me and the ferrets’, The Guardian, 25 April 2019: https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/apr/25/nancy-banks-smith-on-the-archers-joe-grundy-farewell-from-me-and-the-ferrets [accessed 20 June 2019]
Hannan, L., and Longair, S., History through Material Culture (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017).
MacGregor, N., A History of the World in 100 Objects (London: Penguin, 2012).
Michael, C., ‘The Ambridge Paradox: Cake Consumption and Metabolic Health in a Defined Rural Population’, in C. Courage and N. Headlam (eds), Custard, Culverts and Cake: Academics on Life in The Archers (Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2017).
Miller, D., The Comfort of Things (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).
Schlereth, T.J., ‘Material Culture Research and Historical Explanation’, The Public Historian, 7:4 (1985), 21-36, p.21 [cited in Hannan and Longair, see above].
Tregorran, J., and Aldridge, J., Ambridge: an English village through the ages (London: Borchester Press, 1982). [Really written by William Smethurst and published in association with Methuen by arrangement with the British Broadcasting Corporation.]

 

We never thought we'd have to spell this out...

…but we LOVE The Archers, despite what a certain national Sunday newspaper said today.

Academic Archers exists to provide a place for us to share our mutual love of The Archers. The new book, whilst gathering together papers which explore feminist perspectives, is in no way hostile to the show. It is a long love letter to The Archers, as is everything we do.

Our values of generosity, curiosity and joyfulness inform our books and conferences and we are heartbroken that anyone could see us in opposition to the show.